The Old Cyberpunk Vision of a World of Neoliberal Corporations Run Amok (rwblog S6E19)

Last updated: Wed Jul 17 2024

Today I am going to ramble about a topic near-and-dear to my heart: we live in a state-based society!

This is occasioned by reading Rebecca Solnit’s¹ “In the Shadow of Silicon Valley”, which is a pretty crotchety, and honestly pretty typical, “back in my day we had real human connection but then Big Tech came in and ruined everything” article. I did not like it! (I will, however, leave the commentary to an appendix.) But I often find these articles slightly baffling, because they ascribe to Big Tech (so, a handful of multi-billion-or-even-trillion-dollar companies like Apple and Microsoft) a level of societal influence that does not always seem warranted?

That’s not to say they’re not influential — they very clearly are — but they’re playing in a world where states set the terms. Apple does not have a military. The United States very much does.

This is the old cyberpunk vision of a world of neoliberal corporations run amok, extending their power over the actual government.² But that’s never quite sat right with me. I sometimes feel like the fish in David Foster Wallace’s parable (sorry):

In this case, the water is “states”. We’re so used to living in a modern world where states claim literally every inch of the planet’s surface (well, except for a small strip of land between Egypt and Sudan) that we barely even notice they’re there, except when we’re slapped in the face with it (i.e. dealing with customs and immigration at a border crossing). Historically this was very much not the case (c.f. The Art of Not Being Governed).

Big Tech is a major power player, yes — but a major power player where the terms are set by state powers. Apple, the largest company in the world (and arguably, in history³), had an operating income of $114 billion in 2023. California’s General Fund was $225.9 billion in 2023. So Apple is half a “California state government,” which doesn’t include, say, the $14.5 billion budget for the City of San Francisco.

I mean, it’s sort of amusing that Apple is fucking with the EU in response to their DMA legislation, but I imagine they will eventually hit the “find out” part of fuck-around-and-find-out.

Other Stuff

• I have redesigned my personal website for the umpteenth time. Check it out 👀

• I have been loving Perplexity, which is basically ChatGPT combined with a search engine — they have their own search index, but they pipe results through an LLM, which then summarizes them with citations. That made it trivial to find those numbers listed above — “what was the operating budget for the City of San Francisco in 2023” got me an answer like “it was $14.5 billion” with a link to that city budget.

Appendix

I don’t want to complain too much about “In the Shadow of Silicon Valley”, since I generally prefer to be positive than negative, so I’ll keep this to a few quotes that really rubbed me the wrong way. (Also, I very much consider this punching up, since Solnit is, like, the most famous Bay Area writer living today.)

• Solnit complains about self-driving cars at length, arguing that driving is “a co-operative social activity, in which part of the job of whoever’s behind the wheel is to communicate with others on the road.” This is a description so at odds with my rather perilous existence as a pedestrian that I genuinely wonder if she has ever walked or biked in the City of San Francisco. Drivers regularly (and intentionally!) power through crosswalks while pedestrians are still crossing, honking at the idiots that thought they could walk in this walkable city, and they regularly (and intentionally!) run no-right-turn-on-reds at absurdly high risk to cyclists.

• Solnit quotes from The Death and Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs approvingly, and then bemoans the fact that everyone just uses their cellphones instead of providing “eyes on the street”. This is deeply amusing because Jacobs actually uses San Francisco’s civic center as a badly designed neighborhood that doesn’t provide “eyes on the street”, even back in the ‘50s, in contrast to say North Beach (a neighborhood Solnit seems rather fond of).

• Solnit complains about Salesforce Tower, “whose resemblance, thanks to its curved sides and blunt edges, to a dildo or penis is often noted. It’s certainly a monument to hubris. It’s so tall that its isolated tip can be seen from many vantage points in the Bay Area.” Again, deeply amusing, since this sounds exactly like late-70s descriptions of the now-iconic Transmerica Pyramid, a building I would bet Solnit appreciates.

Does San Francisco have problems? Yes! Are some of them due to the pernicious influence of Big Tech™️? Sure! But I just don’t see how this kind of grim, pessimistic take helps at all.

Then again, maybe I’m an optimist.