Subjected to Voir Dire Questioning
Last updated: 1/10/2026 | Originally published: 1/10/2026

This week I did my Civic Duty™️ and reported for jury duty.
An oddity about the jury selection process is that the pool of potential jurors — in this case, almost 80 — is much larger than the number of jurors required — the colloquial 12 Angry Men and three alternates. Batches of jurors are subjected to voir dire questioning, then both sides can dismiss a certain number of questioned jurors (in this case, 10 each), which are then replaced from the pool of potential jurors listening on the sidelines. But they’re replaced in a pre-selected random order, so if you’re at the end of that list, it’s more or less mathematically impossible that you’re actually called up for questioning, let alone serve — but you’re legally required to sit and watch all the questioning, just in case. I’m curious about the deliberations that resulted in such a large number of potential jurors being asked to take multiple days (!) out of their lives for every single case.
Another oddity: I’ve heard through the grapevine that lawyers strongly prefer to dismiss jurors with any kind of analytical training — software engineers, academics, other lawyers — so they have more flexibility in guiding the jurors. Sure enough: every single software engineer was dismissed, regardless of how many questions they answered during voir dire.
I’ve been reading Free Food For Millionaires for a book club and realized: “book club books” really is a genre all its own, isn’t it? There’s a particular brand of popular literary fiction, critically well-regarded but not necessarily award-winning, generally slice-of-life, sometimes quite lengthy, usually (but not always) written by women, which all have somewhat similar styles — Min Jin Lee and Celine Ng and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow and, arguably, Hanya Yanagihara. I’m sure this isn’t a novel observation, but I can’t remember much discussion of it. Perhaps it’s a contemporary extension of the mid-century middlebrow genre, as described by Naomi Kanakia? (I am almost certain Kanakia has written about “book club books” in similar terms before, but I can’t find it!)
Yesterday I checked out Brucato Spirits’ distillery tour-and-tasting in the Mission District — highly recommended if you, like myself, are a fan of amaro or gin.
It turns out their entire operation is still largely run by the cofounders and their head distiller, and their recently-opened distillery is basically a 2000-liter still, a dozen thousand-liter stainless-steel drums, and a bottling machine, all operated out of an industrial garage that’s maybe three times the size of my apartment, tops. Something about that description — the combination of scrappiness and quality — is charmingly Bay Area; the idea that you can just start making chocolate or start making olive oil or start a community space. But it also makes one wish commercial rents in San Francisco and the Bay Area were cheaper; one suspects Brucato’s operation is heavily subsidized by the price of the bottles and the trendy bar-slash-restaurant on site, and, of course, one quietly assumes the cofounders had Tech Money™️ to start with (though, to be clear, I don’t know their background).
Also neat: they’re named for John Brucato, a San Francisco transplant that founded California’s first farmer’s market, the direct ancestor of today’s Alemany Farmer’s Market.
Reply by email!